Self-Healing Engineering Systems through Autonomous Fault Recovery Mechanisms

Authors

  • ASMATH FARHANA Department of Software Engineering, RST University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64137/31078699/IJETET-V2I2P105

Keywords:

Self-Healing Engineering Systems, Autonomous Fault Recovery, Fault Detection, Fault Diagnosis, Fault Tolerance, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Autonomous Systems, Predictive Maintenance, System Resilience, Intelligent Monitoring, Automated Recovery, System Reliability, Failure Prediction, Engineering System Resilience

Abstract

With the increasing complexity, interconnection and continuous operation of modern engineering systems, System reliability, availability, and resilience have become fundamental requirements in such cases. Traditional fault management systems depend on human oversight and predefined recovery procedures, leading to significant downtime along with sluggish responses in the event of unexpected failures. An intriguing class of systems that improve the abilities mentioned above are self-healing engineering systems, where a system detects faults in its services as they happen through continuous monitoring or on-demand testing processes; analyses the root causes, and recovers from damage autonomously without human involvement. This work studies the resilient autonomous fault recovery mechanisms that improve complex engineering system operability. The approach offers a unified self-healing architecture that integrates continuous monitoring, fault detection, intelligent diagnosis, and automated decision-making and recovery capabilities. This system continuously monitors all the operational data coming from different engineering components via sensors and agents, capturing it in external logs. Abnormal condition detection based on advanced data analytics, AI and ML techniques can help in detecting abnormal system behaviour which potentially causes a failure before it significantly impacts the performance of your highly targeted systems. When a fault is detected, the data available for diagnosis will be analysed to determine what component in the system might have failed and how serious that failure potentially was. Depending on the diagnosis, an autonomous recovery mechanism chooses and performs action(s) such as service restart, component replacement/upgrade/load distribution/configuration reconfiguration. Detailed information about the recovery is used by requesting continuous feedback from it, allowing it to assess how effective its last step was and to choose suitable responses for future cases. The proposed self-healing framework aims to minimise system downtime, increase fault tolerance and operational reliability while reducing human intervention. The approach is capable of autonomous fault detection, diagnosis and recovery as well as continual adaptation for reliable operation in many different critical engineering environments, including industrial automation, aerospace systems, smart manufacturing, energy infrastructure-related applications, robotics and IoT-based applications, etc. Intelligent monitoring and self-recovery methods make it easier for engineering systems to tackle changes in operating conditions or disturbances from failures. In summary, the solution presented shows how self-healing technology has significant potential in making complex systems more available and maintainable while ensuring continuous operation as well as enabling future autonomous engineering capabilities.

References

[1] J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess, "The vision of autonomic computing," computer, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41–50, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1109/mc.2003.1160055.

[2] M. Salehie and L. Tahvildari, "Self-adaptive software," ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–42, May 2009, doi: 10.1145/1516533.1516538.

[3] R. de Lemos et al., "Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: A Second Research Roadmap," Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II, pp. 1–32, 2013, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35813-5_1.

[4] Betty et al., "Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: A Research Roadmap," Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1–26, June 2009, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02161-9_1.

[5] S.-W. Cheng, V. V. Poladian, D. Garlan, and B. Schmerl, "Improving Architecture-Based Self-Adaptation through Resource Prediction," Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 71–88, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02161-9_4.

[6] M. García-Fernández, Diana Pelaz Flores, and Ricardo Pichel Gotérrez, “Galicia y El-Rey o cómo reinar desde la distancia: comunicación política en torno a dos nuevos privilegios rodados de Juan II,” Madrygal, vol. 23, pp. 139–180, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.5209/madr.73069.

[7] D. Garlan, S.-W. Cheng, A.-C. Huang, B. Schmerl, and P. Steenkiste, "Rainbow: architecture-based self-adaptation with reusable infrastructure," Computer, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 46–54, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1109/mc.2004.175.

[8] M. C. Fernández, “Intercambios artísticos en una diócesis transfronteriza,” Medievalista online, no. 31, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.4000/medievalista.5095.

[9] S. Dobson et al., "A survey of autonomic communications," ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 223–259, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1145/1186778.1186782.

[10] Avizienis, J.-C., Laprie, B., Randell, and C. Landwehr, "Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing," IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–33, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1109/tdsc.2004.2.

[11] W.-K. Ji, R. Chakrabarti, X. Fan, L. Schoenfeld, S. Strack, and H. N. Higgs, "Receptor-mediated Drp1 oligomerisation on endoplasmic reticulum," The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 216, no. 12, pp. 4123–4139, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1083/jcb.201610057.

[12] V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, K. Yin, and S. N. Kavuri, "A review of process fault detection and diagnosis," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 293–311, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0098-1354(02)00160-6.

[13] K. S. Jardine, D. Lin, and D. Banjevic, "A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance," Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1483–1510, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012.

[14] R. Zhao, R. Yan, Z. Chen, K. Mao, P. Wang, and R. X. Gao, "Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring," Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 115, pp. 213–237, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050.

[15] Seknametla, P. R., & Sunkara, R. (2023). GitOps at Scale: Multi-Cluster Kubernetes Management Using Declarative Infrastructure Pipelines.

[16] S. K. Sunkara, A. I. Ashirova, Y. Gulora, R. R. Baireddy, T. Tiwari and G. V. Sudha, "AI-Driven Big Data Analytics in Cloud Environments: Applications and Innovations," 2025 World Skills Conference on Universal Data Analytics and Sciences (WorldSUAS), Indore, India, 2025, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/WorldSUAS66815.2025.11199123.

[17] T. P. Carvalho, F. A. A. M. N. Soares, R. Vita, R. da P. Francisco, J. P. Basto, and S. G. S. Alcalá, "A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 137, no. 1, p. 106024, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024.

[18] Visweswaran, K. (2026, March). Cross-Layer AI Optimisation Techniques for Thermal Management in Wearable Intelligent Devices. In 2026 International Conference on Machine Learning and Autonomous Systems (ICMLAS) (pp. 1557-1564). IEEE.

[19] Shashank, A. (2025). Self-Healing Data Pipelines for Enhanced Reliability: A Paradigm Shift in Enterprise Data Management. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(8), 1097-1104

[20] K. K. Sharma, S. Jeswani and S. T. Bellapukonda, "Enhancing Intrusion Detection Systems Using RNN and CNN Models on Cloud Network Data," 2025 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Communication Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICoCET), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2025, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ICoCET66176.2025.11233064.

[21] Veershetty, G. (2019). From Legacy Back Office to Intelligent Utility Enterprise a Practitioner Case Study of SAP Cloud Transformation and Utility IT Landscape Modernization. American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 1(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V1I1P103

[22] Seknametla, P. R. (2026). Autonomous DevOps platforms: The role of generative AI in CI/CD optimization and infrastructure management. The Review of Contemporary Scientific and Academic Studies, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.55454/rcsas.6.03.2026.002

[23] M. , R. M. (2023). The Role of Data Analytics in Procurement and Supply Chain Optimization: A Case Study Approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning, 4(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9262.IJAIDSML-V4I2P103

[24] Merakanapalli, S., & Bodapati, S. J. (2026, March). Integrated Wire-Control Systems for Next-Generation Vehicles. In 2026 9th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) (pp. 705-713). IEEE.

[25] Kanchumarthi, S. N. V. P. (2024). Hybrid network security architecture: F5–AWS integration, zero-trust enforcement, and SD-WAN for PCI DSS-compliant hybrid environments. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(1), 2111-2117.

[26] SUNKARA, S. K. (2025). LEVERAGING AI, IoT, AND BLOCKCHAIN FOR SCALABLE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN POST-HARVEST SUPPLY CHAINS: A MULTI-SECTOR APPROACH TO ENHANCING EFFICIENCY AND TRACEABILITY (Vol. 26, Issue 7, pp. 2757–2766).

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Self-Healing Engineering Systems through Autonomous Fault Recovery Mechanisms. (2026). International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, 2(2), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.64137/31078699/IJETET-V2I2P105