Cloud-Native Engineering Simulation Framework for High-Performance Computing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64137/31078699/IJETET-V2I2P103Keywords:
Cloud-Native Computing, Engineering Simulation, High-Performance Computing (HPC), Cloud Computing, Microservices, Containerization, Kubernetes, Distributed Computing, Scalable Computing, Elastic Resource Allocation, Simulation Framework, Computational Engineering, Digital Twins, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Performance OptimizationAbstract
Cloud-Native Engineering Simulation Framework for HPC presents a new approach to compute complex engineering simulations in cloud-native technology and high-performance computing (HPC) resources. Standard engineering simulation systems frequently struggle with scalability, costly infrastructure requirements like memory bandwidth and other resources and automation of computational workflows. This framework proposes a solution for these challenges by integrating containerization, microservices using orchestration, distributed computing and elastic cloud resources to have an all-in-one simulation environment. This framework allows engineering applications to allocate computational resources dynamically and as per workload needs, thus achieving large improvements in simulation speed, scalability/flexibility and utilization of computing resources. Cloud-native principles also enable automated deployment, fault tolerance, as well as workload management and straightforward integration of simulation tools and data-processing pipelines. The methods that we proposed can be used in computationally intensive domains such as: (i) structural analysis, (ii) fluid dynamics and heat transfer simulations [26], impact prediction of aerospace structures over operational conditions from processing history [19], including recent efforts in digital twin applications. In short, the framework allows running of engineering applications in a high-performance setting while also minimizing infrastructure dependence and supporting resource usage enhancements performed over virtual machines. The framework also facilitates use of advanced technologies like artificial intelligence, machine learning and digital twins along with high-performance engineering simulations in a single Integrated-Cookbook approach using highly available real-time data. Utilizing cloud-based data storage and distributed computing environments enables the efficient processing of large-scale simulation data in a live or near-real-time mode. Containerized simulation environments offer platform independence and automate deployment, setup and maintenance of engineering applications. Also, with automated workflow management, less human involvement is needed and it also provides scientists and engineers an opportunity to run multiple simulation experiments at one time. The new cloud-native framework enables greater sharing so that sim resources and comp workflows are accessible to delivery teams in remote locations. Its elastic structure helps in scaling up and down of resources as per computational workload, thus optimizing performance and saving unnecessary infrastructure costs. Therefore, it can facilitate both small experiments and trials as well as large industrial simulations. Integrating HPC features with cloud native architecture will provide a scalable and efficient computational environment for the next generation of engineering simulation that can facilitate faster decisions, better resource utilization and more correct outcomes in Engineering.
References
[1] S. Benedict, "Performance issues and performance analysis tools for HPC cloud applications: a survey," Computing, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 89–108, Sept. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s00607-012-0213-0.
[2] R. Buyya, J. Broberg and A. Goscinski, Cloud Computing. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011. doi: 10.1002/9780470940105.
[3] E. Deelman, D. Gannon, M. Shields and I. Taylor, "Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 528–540, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2008.06.012.
[4] Foster, Y. Zhao, I. Raicu and S. Lu, "Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared," 2008 Grid Computing Environments Workshop, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1109/gce.2008.4738445.
[5] W. B. March, B. Xiao, S. Tharakan, C. D. Yu and G. Biros, "A kernel-independent FMM in general dimensions," Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp. 1–12, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1145/2807591.2807647.
[6] K. R. Jackson et al., "Performance Analysis of High Performance Computing Applications on the Amazon Web Services Cloud," 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1109/cloudcom.2010.69.
[7] H. Luo, H. Cai, H. Yu, Y. Sun, Z. Bi and L. Jiang, "A short-term energy prediction system based on edge computing for smart city," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 101, pp. 444–457, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.06.030.
[8] L. Gren, R. Torkar and R. Feldt, "Group development and group maturity when building agile teams: A qualitative and quantitative investigation at eight large companies," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 124, pp. 104–119, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.024.
[9] Animesh Kuity and S. K. Peddoju, "Investigating performance metrics for container-based HPC environments using x86 and OpenPOWER systems," Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13677-023-00546-z.
[10] E. Deelman, D. Gannon, M. Shields and I. Taylor, "Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 528–540, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2008.06.012.
[11] G. M. Kurtzer, V. Sochat and M. W. Bauer, "Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute," PLOS ONE, vol. 12, no. 5, p. e0177459, May 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459.
[12] C. Pahl, A. Brogi, J. Soldani and P. Jamshidi, "Cloud Container Technologies: A State-of-the-Art Review," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 677–692, July 2019, doi: 10.1109/tcc.2017.2702586.
[13] Y. Xu, G. Wang, J. Ren and Y. Zhang, "An adaptive and configurable protection framework against Android privilege escalation threats," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 92, pp. 210–224, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.09.042.
[14] J. Wu, M. Xu, Y. He, K. Ye and C. Xu, "Cloudnativesim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Cloud‐Native Applications," Software: Practice and Experience, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1185–1208, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1002/spe.3417.
[15] Seknametla, P. R. (2025). FinOps-aware DevOps practices: Optimizing cloud cost efficiency through continuous monitoring and automation. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques, 9(5). https://www.ijcsejournal.org/
[16] C. Peña-Monferrer, R. Manson-Sawko and V. Elisseev, "HPC-cloud native framework for concurrent simulation, analysis and visualization of CFD workflows," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 123, pp. 14–23, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.04.008.
[17] K. K. Sharma, S. Jeswani and S. T. Bellapukonda, "Enhancing Intrusion Detection Systems Using RNN and CNN Models on Cloud Network Data," 2025 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Communication Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICoCET), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2025, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ICoCET66176.2025.11233064.
[18] Veershetty, G. (2019). From Legacy Back Office to Intelligent Utility Enterprise a Practitioner Case Study of SAP Cloud Transformation and Utility IT Landscape Modernization. American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 1(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V1I1P103
[19] Akinapalli, S. (2025). Metadata-driven data integration framework: Automating enterprise data integration through declarative approaches. European Modern Studies Journal, 9(4), 9. http://www.journal-ems.com
[20] Kanchumarthi, S. N. V. P. (2024). Hybrid network security architecture: F5–AWS integration, zero-trust enforcement, and SD-WAN for PCI DSS-compliant hybrid environments. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(1), 2111-2117.
[21] Merakanapalli, S., & Bodapati, S. J. (2025). Transitioning from AUTOSAR classic to adaptive for service-based architectures. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, 6(4), 7-17.
[22] Seknametla, P. R. (2026). Advanced Telemetry Correlation Techniques for Real-Time Reliability Engineering in Edge-Cloud Systems. International Journal of Science, Technology and Convergence, 8(8). Retrieved from https://ijcdra.us/index.php/IJSTC/article/view/67
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


