Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection in Logistics Quality Data Streams

Authors

  • G. RAJAGANESAN Department of Commerce, Thanthai Periyar Government Arts and Science College, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64137/31078699/IJETET-V2I1P105

Keywords:

Self-Supervised Learning, Anomaly Detection, Logistics Quality Management, Supply Chain Analytics, Streaming Data, Artificial Intelligence, Quality Engineering

Abstract

The increasing digitalization of logistics operations has resulted in continuous streams of quality-related data generated from sensors, automation systems, and information platforms. Traditional anomaly detection approaches often rely on labeled datasets or static rules, which are impractical in dynamic logistics environments where quality deviations are rare, evolving, and context-dependent. This study proposes a self-supervised anomaly detection framework for monitoring logistics quality data streams in real time. The proposed approach learns normal operational patterns directly from unlabeled data by leveraging self-supervised learning techniques, enabling the detection of handling, transportation, storage, and sensor-related anomalies without prior fault annotations. The framework incorporates adaptive anomaly scoring and streaming data processing to address concept drift and operational variability. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms conventional unsupervised and supervised baselines in terms of detection accuracy, robustness, and early warning capability. The findings highlight the potential of self-supervised learning as an effective tool for proactive quality assurance in modern logistics and supply chain systems.

References

[1] V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, “Anomaly Detection: A Survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1–58, Jul. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882.

[2] L. Ruff et al., “A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detection,” arxiv.org, Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2021.3052449.

[3] L. Bergman and Yedid Hoshen, “Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Data,” Openreview.net, 2020. https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1lK_lBtvS (accessed May 08, 2026).

[4] P. Malhotra, A. Ramakrishnan, G. Anand, L. Vig, P. Agarwal, and G. R. Shroff, “LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detection,” Jul. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1607.00148.

[5] T. Zonta, C. A. da Costa, R. da Rosa Righi, M. J. de Lima, E. S. da Trindade, and G. P. Li, “Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 150, p. 106889, Dec. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106889

[6] A. Iqbal, R. Amin, F. S. Alsubaei, and A. Alzahrani, “Anomaly detection in multivariate time series data using deep ensemble models,” PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 6, p. e0303890, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303890.

[7] M. Ahmed, A. Naser Mahmood, and J. Hu, “A survey of network anomaly detection techniques,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 60, pp. 19–31, Jan. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.016.

[8] “Goodfellow, I., et al. (2016) Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. - References - Scientific Research Publishing,” www.scirp.org. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?

[9] K. Zhang et al., “Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, pp. 1–20, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2024.3387317.

[10] T. P. Carvalho, F. A. A. M. N. Soares, R. Vita, R. da P. Francisco, J. P. Basto, and S. G. S. Alcalá, “A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 137, no. 1, p. 106024, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection in Logistics Quality Data Streams. (2026). International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, 2(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.64137/31078699/IJETET-V2I1P105