Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Quality Optimization in Inventory Flow

Authors

  • NALINISIVAKUMAR Department of physics, Kunthavai Naachchiyar Govt arts and science college Thanjavur. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64137/31078699/IJETET-V2I1P104

Keywords:

Reinforcement Learning, Inventory Flow Optimization, Quality Management, Dynamic Decision-Making, Supply Chain Analytics, Quality Degradation, Intelligent Inventory Systems, Operations Research

Abstract

Efficient inventory flow management requires balancing cost, service level, and product quality in environments characterized by uncertainty and dynamic demand. Traditional inventory optimization models often rely on static assumptions and predefined decision rules, limiting their ability to adapt to real-time changes in quality degradation, demand variability, and operational constraints. This paper proposes a reinforcement learning–based framework for dynamic quality optimization in inventory flow systems. By modeling inventory decisions as a sequential decision-making problem, the proposed approach enables an intelligent agent to learn optimal ordering, holding, and allocation policies that minimize quality loss while maintaining operational efficiency. The framework incorporates quality-aware reward functions and state representations that capture inventory levels, product age, demand uncertainty, and quality decay dynamics. Experimental results demonstrate that reinforcement learning policies outperform conventional inventory control models in reducing quality-related losses, improving service levels, and adapting to fluctuating operating conditions. The findings highlight the potential of reinforcement learning as a powerful tool for achieving dynamic, data-driven inventory quality optimization in modern supply chain systems.

References

[1] R. S. Sutton and A. Barto, Reinforcement learning: An introduction, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Ma ; London: The Mit Press, 2018.

[2] D. Silver et al., “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search,” Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, Jan. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961.

[3] “P. H. Zipkin, ‘Foundations of Inventory Management,’ McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, 2000. - References - Scientific Research Publishing,” Scirp.org, 2025. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=983941

[4] S. Nahmias and T. Olsen, Production and operations analysis : strategy, quality, analytics, application. Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc, 2015.

[5] B. Van Roy, R. S. Sutton, S. Singh, and C. Szepesvári, “Foundations of reinforcement learning,” Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 197–346, 2021.

[6] E. Mohebbi, and F. Choobineh, “Perishable inventory systems with multiple deterioration rates,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 704–717, 2005.

[7] I. Giannoccaro and P. Pontrandolfo, “Inventory management in supply chains: a reinforcement learning approach,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 153–161, Jul. 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(00)00156-0.

[8] D. P. Bertsekas, Reinforcement learning and optimal control. Belmont, Massachusetts: Athena Scientific, 2019.

[9] A. G. Kök, M. L. Fisher, and R. Vaidyanathan, “Assortment Planning: Review of Literature and Industry Practice,” Retail Supply Chain Management, pp. 99–153, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78902-6_6.

[10] R. N. Boute, S. M. Disney, M. R. Lambrecht, and B. Van Houdt, “A win–win solution for the bullwhip problem,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 108, no. 1–2, pp. 125–137, 2007.

[11] W. B. Powell, Approximate Dynamic Programming. Wiley, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118029176.

[12] C. S. Tang, “Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions,” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–45, Mar. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560500405584.

[13] A. Pandiammal, K. Iyna, “The Causality between FII and BSE in India,” International Journal of Applied Social Science, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1357-1361, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Quality Optimization in Inventory Flow. (2026). International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, 2(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.64137/31078699/IJETET-V2I1P104