Algorithmic Power and the Dialectics of Humanity: Artificial Intelligence, Capital, and the Reconfiguration of Social Totality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64137/31079385/IJMHSS-V2I2P102Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Dialectical Anthropology, Political Economy, Coloniality, Labor, Power, Gramsci, Marx, Polanyi, FanonAbstract
Artificial intelligence is commonly portrayed as a technical innovation that inaugurates a new social epoch defined by efficiency, automation, and rational governance. This article advances a dialectical anthropological critique of such narratives by situating artificial intelligence within the historical dynamics of capitalism, colonial power, and struggles over labor and knowledge. Conceptualizing artificial intelligence as a social relation rather than a neutral technology, the article draws on Marxian political economy, Fanonian analyses of colonial domination, Gramscian theories of hegemony, Polanyian insights about market disembedding, and Comaroffian critiques of contemporary capitalism. It contends that AI, through labour, epistemology, or governance, is the new hyper-driven moment of commodification and cycle of global inequalities. Meanwhile, AI creates inconsistencies that break down established value and authority regimes, laying the ground for contestation and possible other trajectories. The paper outlines new directions for a critical anthropology of AI that foregrounds historical materiality and contradictions while committing the field to decolonial epistemologies and transformative praxis.
References
[1] D. Beer, “The social power of algorithms,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2016.1216147.
[2] S. Fazelpour and D. Danks, “Algorithmic bias: Senses, sources, Solutions,” Philosophy Compass, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1–16, June 2021, doi: 10.1111/phc3.12760.
[3] S. Browne, “Dark Matters,” Sept. 2015, doi: 10.1215/9780822375302.
[4] J. Burrell, “How the Machine ‘thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms,” Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2053951715622512.
[5] D. Gritsenko and M. Wood, “Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach,” Regulation & Governance, vol. 16, no. 1, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1111/rego.12367.
[6] S.-J. Cooper-Knock, “Beyond Agamben: Sovereignty, policing and ‘permissive space’ in South Africa, and beyond,” Theoretical Criminology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 22–41, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1362480616680704.
[7] N. Couldry and U. A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection. Stanford University Press, 2020. doi: 10.1515/9781503609754.
[8] Mbembe, “Necropolitics,” Public Culture, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11–40, 2003.
[9] M. Fourcade and K. Healy, “Seeing like a market,” Socio-Economic Review, vol. 15, no. 1, p. mww033, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1093/ser/mww033.
[10] M. Fourcade and F. Johns, “Loops, ladders and links: the recursivity of social and machine learning,” Theory and Society, vol. 49, no. 5–6, pp. 803–832, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11186-020-09409-x.
[11] X. Minocher and C. Randall, “Predictable policing: New technology, Old bias, and Future Resistance in Big Data Surveillance,” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 26, no. 5–6, p. 135485652093383, June 2020, doi: 10.1177/1354856520933838.
[12] S. Hall, “Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity,” Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 5–27, June 1986, doi: 10.1177/019685998601000202.
[13] R. Dorschel, “Reconsidering digital labour: Bringing tech workers into the debate,” New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 37, no. 2, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12225.
[14] J. Glassman, “Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession, accumulation by ‘extra-economic’ means,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 608–625, Oct. 2006.
[15] T. Kukutai and J. Taylor, Indigenous Data Sovereignty. ANU Press, 2016. doi: 10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.
[16] D. Harvey, “Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction,” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 610, no. 1, pp. 21–44, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0002716206296780.
[17] M. Postone, “Time, Labor, and Social Domination,” Apr. 1993, doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511570926.
[18] D. Stark and I. Pais, “Algorithmic Management in the Platform Economy,” Sociologica, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 47–72, 2020, doi: 10.6092/issn.1971-8853/12221.
[19] “OSF,” Doi.org, 2026. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/f3scj (accessed July 11, 2026).
[20] J. Auernhammer, “Design Research in Innovation Management: a pragmatic and human‐centered approach,” R&D Management, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 412–428, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1111/radm.12409.
[21] P. Moleka, “A Foundational Science of Intelligence Beyond the Human,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2026, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6012054.
[22] C. Tagliapietra, “Doing Theology Creatively in a Scientific Age: Tradition, Reflexivity, and Second-Order Cybernetics,” Religions, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 242, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.3390/rel17020242.
[23] P. Moleka, Ed., “Empowering Africa: Harnessing Inclusive Innovation for Sustainable Development,” Feb. 2026, doi: 10.3726/b23110.
[24] F. Pasquale, “The Black Box Society,” Harvard University Press, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674736061.
[25] “Wolfgang Streeck, How Will Capitalism End?, NLR 87, May–June 2014,” New Left Review. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii87/articles/wolfgang-streeck-how-will-capitalism-end (accessed July 11, 2026).
[26] Moishe Postone, Time, Labor, and Social Domination. 1993. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511570926.
[27] L. Suchman, “Algorithmic warfare and the reinvention of accuracy,” Critical Studies on Security, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–13, May 2020, doi: 10.1080/21624887.2020.1760587.
[28] S. R. Carroll, D. Rodriguez-Lonebear, and A. Martinez, “Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations,” Data Science Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 31, July 2019, doi: 10.5334/dsj-2019-031.
[29] P. Tubaro, A. A. Casilli, and M. Coville, “The trainer, the verifier, the imitator: Three ways in which human platform workers support artificial intelligence,” Big Data & Society, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 205395172091977, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1177/2053951720919776.
[30] S. Zuboff, “Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action,” New Labor Forum, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 10–29, Jan. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461.
