A Syntactic Study of Existential and Equational Processes in English and Fulfulde Spoken in Adamawa State, Nigeria

Authors

  • BAMANGA ALIYU General Studies Department, Federal Polytechnic, Bali, Taraba State, Nigeria. Author
  • ADAMU ISA HALIRU Department of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Taraba State University, Jalingo, Nigeria. Author
  • SUMAYYAT IBRAHIM GAMBO Department of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Taraba State University, Jalingo, Nigeria. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64137/31079385/IJMHSS-V1I2P104

Keywords:

Fulfulde, English, Existential Constructions, Equational Processes, Cross-linguistic Syntax

Abstract

This study investigates existential and equational processes in English and Fulfulde spoken in Adamawa state, Nigeria, using a syntactic approach. The aim is to explore how these processes are realized in both languages, focusing on points of similarity and divergence. Specifically, it seeks to identify the nature of existential and equational syntactic processes, describe their structural patterns with reference to sentence constituents, and categorize them according to their linguistic forms. A descriptive research design was employed, with data collected from native speakers of Fulfulde in Adamawa and systematically compared with English equivalents. It is anchored on Principles and Parameters Theory by Chomsky and refines within the Minimalist Program. It highlights the universality of predication while accounting for parametric variations. Analysis reveals that English existential constructions obligatorily employ the expletive 'there' and the copula 'is', whereas Fulfulde relies on the particle 'ɗon' often without an expletive subject. In equational constructions, English consistently uses the copula 'is', while Fulfulde alternates between 'ɗum', 'woni' or simple juxtaposition, demonstrating structural flexibility and derivational economy. The findings show that while both languages operate under universal syntactic principles, Fulfulde encodes these processes more economically, in contrast to English’s stricter word-order constraints. These outcomes have theoretical implications for cross-linguistic syntax and validate the application of generative frameworks to African languages. Practically, the study provides insights for linguistic research, language teaching, translation, and computational modelling of under-documented languages

References

[1] M. S. Aboki and B. Aliyu, “Syntactic Analysis of Language Used in Selected Nigerian Newspapers,” Ahyu: A Journal of Language and Literature, vol. 7, pp. 100-77, 2024.

[2] Clara Ikekeonwu, “Tone, Intonation and Pitch-Accent in Igbo,” International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (Linqua- LLC), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-9, 2016.

[3] David Adger, Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, Oxford University Press, 2003.

[4] Afrim Aliti, Exploring the Role of Syntax in Language Comprehension and Production, South East European University, Tetovo, North Macedonia, 2023.

[5] Bamanga Aliyu, and Shamsu Muazu Danbukar, Investigating Syntactic Patterns in Sanusi Bako’s The Mambilla Plateau, International Journal of English Language and Communication Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 74-83, 2025.

[6] Douglas Biber et al., Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Pearson Education, pp. 91-93, 1999.

[7] J. Bresnan, “Is Syntactic Knowledge Probabilistic?” Linguistics, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 691-710, 2007.

[8] A. Carnie, Syntax: A Generative Introduction, 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. [E-book] Available: Wiley Reader or Vital Source

[9] Andrew Carnie, Modern Syntax, 2nd ed. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2021.

[10] Dave Willis, Rules, Patterns and Words: Grammar and Lexis in English Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-248, 2003.

[11] Noam Chomsky, Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures, Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1981.

[12] Noam Chomsky, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, pp. 1-251, 1965.

[13] Noam Chomsky, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, 1995.

[14] N.Chomsky, On phases, In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, and M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), “Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory,” MIT Press, pp. 133-166, 2008.

[15] P. W. Culicover, and R. Jackendoff, Simpler Syntax, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-589, 2005.

[16] Stéphane Robert, Focus in Atlantic languages, Typological Studies in Language, John Benjamins, pp.233-260, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.91.09rob

[17] A. E. Goldberg, “Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language,” Oxford University Press, 2006.

[18] Liliane Haegeman, “Thinking Syntactically: A guide to Argumentation and Analysis,” Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1-386, 2006.

[19] Liliane Haegeman, “Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery,” Oxford University Press, 2012.

[20] I. A. Haliru, and B. Aliyu, “Syntactic Study of Linguistic Competence on the Use of Simple Present Tense among some Students of Federal Polytechnic Bali,” Taraba State, Jalingo Journal of Linguistics and Literary studies (JAJOLLS), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15-27, 2025.

[21] R. Huddleston, and G. K. Pullum, “The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language,” Cambridge University Press, 2002.

[22] Ray Jackendoff, “Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution,” Oxford University Press, pp. 1-477, 2002.

[23] Ismail Junaidu, “Topicalization in Hausa,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Bloomington, Indiana University, pp. 1-498, 1987.

[24] Ibrahim Yaro Yahaya, Abba Rufa'i, and Al-Amin Abu-Manga, Studies in Hausa Language, Literature and Culture, Proceedings of the Second Hausa International Conference, Centre for the Study of Nigerian Languages, Bayero University, pp. 1-486, 1981.

[25] Mark C. Baker, Chapter 12. Elements of a Typology of Applicatives in Bant, Current Approaches to African Linguistic, vol. 7, pp. 111–124, 1990.

[26] Jason Merchant, “The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis,” Oxford University Press, pp. 1-262, 2001.

[27] DEO NGONY ANI, Sentential Negation and Verb Movement in Bantu Languages, Berkeley Linguistics Society, 201–212, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v28i1.3835

[28] F. J. Newmeyer, “Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage,” Language, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 682-707, 2003.

[29] S. Ncube, “Discourse Marking and Insertions in Southern Bantu Syntax,” Southern African Linguistic Studies, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 101–119, 2024.

[30] Geoffrey K. Pullum, and Barbara C. Scholz, “Empirical Assessment of Stimulus Poverty Arguments,” The Linguistic Review, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 9-50, 2002.

[31] Andrew Radford, “Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach,” Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[32] Andrew Radford, “Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction,” Cambridge University Press, 2020.

[33] Kirsten Anne Fudeman, “Topics in the Morphology and Syntax of Balanta, an Atlantic Language of Senegal, Thesis, Cornell University, 1999.

[34] Michael Tomasello, “Constructing a language: A Usage-based theory of Language Acquisition,” Harvard University Press, 2003.

[35] Denis Creissels, Construct Forms of Nouns in African Languages, Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation & Linguistic Theory, Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Peter Sells(Eds), SOAS, London, pp. 73-82, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Syntactic Study of Existential and Equational Processes in English and Fulfulde Spoken in Adamawa State, Nigeria. (2025). International Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.64137/31079385/IJMHSS-V1I2P104