Cyberpsychological Conditions of Digital Writing in Contemporary Iranian Contexts

Authors

  • A. HEDIYAH Research Scholar, PG & Research Department of English, National College (Autonomous), Bharathidasan University, Trichy. Author
  • DR. S. MAHA Assistant Professor and Research Advisor, PG & Research Department of English, National College (Autonomous), Bharathidasan University, Trichy. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64137/31078729/IJLLH-V2I4P101

Keywords:

Cyberpsychology, Iranian Digital Writing, Self-Censorship, Algorithmic Mediation, Online Surveillance, Literary Form

Abstract

Contemporary Iranian digital writing develops within an online environment shaped by censorship, surveillance, uneven access, and the uncertain visibility of platformed expression. While studies of Iranian writing have often foregrounded political resistance, this conceptual-analytical article examines how cyberpsychological pressures may also influence literary form. Bringing cyberpsychological research into conversation with scholarship on digital writing and Iranian internet governance, it considers anticipatory anxiety, impression management, self-censorship, perceived surveillance, and uncertainty about the persistence of online texts. These pressures offer a framework for interpreting fragmentation, ellipsis, metaphorical density, brevity, and unresolved endings not simply as evasive tactics but as aesthetic responses to unstable conditions of publication and circulation. Recent research on digital surveillance, algorithmic attention, and Iranian internet restriction helps clarify how writers may anticipate both human scrutiny and platform-mediated visibility. Two short, explicitly constructed examples illustrate how omission and coded metaphor can operate formally; they are not presented as quotations from actual Iranian users. The article argues that algorithmic mediation and platform volatility can shape not only what becomes visible but also the length, tone, ambiguity, and continuity of digital literary expression. It therefore shifts the discussion from protest alone to the psychological adaptation through which writers negotiate risk while retaining creative agency.

References

[1] Eslam Abdelraouf and H. Amin, “Virtual Facades: Exploring the Relationship Between Self-Presentation on Facebook and Social Anxiety Among Egyptian Generation Z Users,” Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, vol. 17, no. 2, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1386/jammr_00079_1.

[2] D. Boyd, It’s complicated: the Social Lives of Networked teens. Yale University Press, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.danah.org/books/ItsComplicated.pdf

[3] D. Conduit, “The political economy of digital authoritarianism: evidence from the Iranian regime’s implementation of technology,” Democratization, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 62–84, June 2025, doi: 10.1080/13510347.2025.2514766

[4] J. J. Daymude, R. Axelrod, and S. Forrest, “Strategic analysis of dissent and self-censorship,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 122, no. 45, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2508028122.

[5] M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. Penguin Books, 1977.

[6] Freedom House, “Iran: Freedom on the Net 2024 Country Report | Freedom House,” Freedom House, 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/iran/freedom-net/2024

[7] Iran: Freedom on the Net 2025 Country Report | Freedom House,” Freedom House, 2025. https://freedomhouse.org/country/iran/freedom-net/2025

[8] T. Gillespie, Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

[9] S. Jerasa and S. K. Burriss, “Writing with, for, and against the algorithm: TikTokers’ relationships with AI as audience, co-author, and censor,” English teaching, vol. 23, no. 1, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0100.

[10] J. Kim and H. Zo, “Am I watching or being watched? Exploring the selective disclosure paradox in users’ self-censorship to dataveillance awareness in video recommender systems,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 98, p. 102253, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2025.102253.

[11] S. Khosravi, Young and defiant in Tehran. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.

[12] W. Liu, Seo Yoon Lee, and M. Yao, “Acceptance and self-protection in government, commercial, and interpersonal surveillance contexts: An exploratory study,” Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, vol. 18, no. 4, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.5817/cp2024-4-9.

[13] C. Masters-Wheeler, “Algorithmic Attention Systems and Writing-as-Content,” Computers and Composition, vol. 73, p. 102862, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102862.

[14] M. McLuhan, “Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man,” American Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 1964, [Online]. Available: https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/mcluhan.mediummessage.pdf

[15] E. Morozov, The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs, 2011.

[16] C. Parnell, “ALGOSPEAK AND ALGO-DESIGN IN PLATFORMED BOOK PUBLISHING: REVOLUTIONARY CREATIVE TACTICS IN DIGITAL PARATEXT TO CIRCUMVENT CONTENT MODERATION,” AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.5210/spir.v2023i0.13477.

[17] Z. Papacharissi, Affective publics : sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford ; New York, Ny: Oxford University Press, 2015.

[18] M. Michaelsen, “« Cyberdissent: The Internet in Revolutionary Iran ». Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, September 2003.,” Abstracta Iranica, no. Volume 26, May 2005, doi: 10.4000/abstractairanica.1613.

[19] Y. Rezai, “Performing Iran online: digital poetics and feminist activism in the woman life freedom movement,” Journal of Gender Studies, pp. 1–18, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1080/09589236.2024.2386058.

[20] Y. Rezai, “Performing Persian poetics on Instagram: an interview with @barkhi_az_honarmandan,” European Journal of English Studies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 148–162, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13825577.2023.2200360.

[21] A. A. Srebeny and G Khiabany, Blogistan. Editorial: London: Tauris, 2008.

[22] John Suler, “The Psychology of Cyberspace,” International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 184–195, 2005.

[23] J. R. Suler, Psychology of the Digital Age. Cambridge University Press, 2016.

[24] Jonas Tai et al., “IRBlock: A Large-Scale Measurement Study of the Great Firewall of Iran,” Proceedings of the 34th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Association, pp. 705–722, 2025, https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity25/presentation/tai.

[25] S. Talaifar and B. S. Lowery, “Freedom and Constraint in Digital Environments: Implications for the Self,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, p. 174569162210980, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.1177/17456916221098036.

[26] J. B. Thompson, Political Scandal : Power and Visibility in the Media Age, Cambridge: Polity Press, Malden, Ma, 2000.

[27] H. Jafari, H. Keshavarz, M. Khosrowjerdi, D. Rak, and A. Noruzi, “Unpacking drivers of online censorship endorsement: Psychological and demographic factors,” Computers in Human Behavior Reports, vol. 18, p. 100639, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100639.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A., H., & S., M. (2026). Cyberpsychological Conditions of Digital Writing in Contemporary Iranian Contexts. International Journal of Literature, Linguistics, and Humanities, 2(4), 01-06. https://doi.org/10.64137/31078729/IJLLH-V2I4P101