The Linguistic Landscape of AI Communication: Challenges in Human-Machine Interactions

Authors

  • Dr. RADHIKA JANAKIRAM Assistant Professor, Department of English, Acharya Institute of Graduate Studies, Bengaluru, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64137/XXXXXXXX/IJLLH-V1I1P105

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Human-Machine Interaction, Natural Language Processing, Linguistic Landscape, Semantic Ambiguity, Context Awareness, Machine Learning

Abstract

The quick advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) innovations has expanded the mediums of human-machine correspondence to a number of new linguistic communications. In this sense, this paper will delve into a better understanding of the linguistic landscape of AI communication, paying close attention to the challenges of Human–Machine Interactions (HMI). We examine how remaining semantic ambiguities, contextual misunderstanding, syntactic complexity, and pragmatic limitations within AI language processing limit what they can do. This research examines the factors hidden behind the scenes that hinder smooth communication, utilising a multidisciplinary approach that combines computational linguistics, cognitive science, and AI system analysis. The findings reveal gaps in Natural Language Understanding (NLU) for maintaining, highlighting the importance of cultural and linguistic diversity; they also showcase the inadequacies of current machine learning models in perceiving nuanced human expressions. We propose possible paths for adaptive language models and context-aware algorithms to enhance AI communicative competence, which would help build better HMI systems. The results are informative for AI design, linguistic theory and user experience optimization

References

[1] Mihalcea, R., & Tarau, P. (2004, July). Textrank: Bringing order into text. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 404-411).

[2] Manning, C., & Schutze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press.

[3] Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R. R., & Le, Q. V. (2019). Xlnet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32.

[4] Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human–machine communication research agenda. New media & society, 22(1), 70-86.

[5] Conneau, A., Khandelwal, K., Goyal, N., Chaudhary, V., Wenzek, G., Guzmán, F., ... & Stoyanov, V. (2019). Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02116.

[6] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.

[7] Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 9-11). Cambridge: MIT press.

[8] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019, June). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers) (pp. 4171-4186).

[9] Navigli, R. (2009). Word sense disambiguation: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 41(2), 1-69.

[10] Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., ... & Rush, A. M. (2020, October). Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: system demonstrations (pp. 38-45).

[11] Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

[12] Goldberg, Y. (2018). Neural network methods for natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 44(1), 194-195.

[13] Charniak, E. (1997). Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. AAAI/IAAI, 2005(598-603), 18.

[14] Murshed, A. A., Al-Tarawneh, A., Al-Badawi, M., & Alhalalmeh, A. H. (2024). The Influence of Artificial Intelligence and Language in the International Economic Landscape. In Frontiers of Human Centricity in the Artificial Intelligence-Driven Society 5.0 (pp. 999-1009). Springer, Cham.

[15] Hoc, J. M. (2000). From human–machine interaction to human–machine cooperation. Ergonomics, 43(7), 833-843.

[16] Jurafsky, D. (2000). speech & language processing. Pearson Education India.

[17] Fanni, S. C., Febi, M., Aghakhanyan, G., & Neri, E. (2023). Natural language processing. In Introduction to artificial intelligence (pp. 87-99). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[18] Anderson, S. R. (2015). Dimensions of morphological complexity. Understanding and measuring morphological complexity, 11-26.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Linguistic Landscape of AI Communication: Challenges in Human-Machine Interactions. (2025). International Journal of Literature, Linguistics, and Humanities, 1(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.64137/XXXXXXXX/IJLLH-V1I1P105